{"id":103,"date":"2017-05-17T12:03:30","date_gmt":"2017-05-17T12:03:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/?p=103"},"modified":"2018-12-21T01:07:05","modified_gmt":"2018-12-21T01:07:05","slug":"case-study-on-the-litigation-of-traffic-crash-without-expert-witness-inferring","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/case-study-on-the-litigation-of-traffic-crash-without-expert-witness-inferring\/","title":{"rendered":"Case Study on The Litigation of Traffic Crash without Expert Witness Inferring"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Playing an important role of the litigation of traffic crash, the expert witness makes the<\/p>\n<p>reconstruction and the determination of the responsibilities. The persons who involving the crash<\/p>\n<p>could participate and represent opinions, relating the crash occurrence and causes, at the<\/p>\n<p>investigation committee meeting. They have legal right to infer the facts through the evidences in<\/p>\n<p>the dialectical process, moreover, there is no expert witness inferring. The paper introduces the<\/p>\n<p>professional negligence assault, caused by the truck rear-end collision between the motorcycle and<\/p>\n<p>truck. The motorcyclist who have got serious hurt and disability after the tragedy, initiated the case<\/p>\n<p>for satisfaction compensation. No expert witness was provided during the judicial litigation. The<\/p>\n<p>victims research the accident evidence by themselves. The accused appointed four defence<\/p>\n<p>solicitors in sequence to represent the accused in court. They supplied more evidence and debated<\/p>\n<p>with the occurrence and causes of th e crash. Through the criminal county court and the supreme,<\/p>\n<p>and the civil court, the motorcyclist obtained seven millions compensation, while she made<\/p>\n<p>reconciliation and withdraw a lawsuit. It is took a long time about two years and ten months. There<\/p>\n<p>is no similar report and available literature now. This paper focuses on the representation and<\/p>\n<p>deduction of the evidence in this case, defense and justice arguments in the jury, and makes<\/p>\n<p>readers aware of evidence of judicial proceedings and the accident reconstruction.<\/p>\n<p>Keywords<\/p>\n<p>Road traffic accident (RTA), accident investigation, evidence, reconstruction.<\/p>\n<p>Citation information<\/p>\n<p>Wu Chun Liang, Wu Ai Yun, Case Study on the Litigation of Traffic Crash without Expert Witness<\/p>\n<p>Inferring, The Traffic Safety and Law Enforcement Conference in 2013. (in Chinese)<\/p>\n<p>Authors\u2019 information<\/p>\n<p>Corresponding author at: Summerhill RTA Research Foundation, No.96, Wufuxincun, Zhunan<\/p>\n<p>Township, Miaoli County 350, Taiwan (R.O.C.)<\/p>\n<p>E-mail addresses: summerhill.org@gmail.com (Wu Chun Liang), IreneWu103@gmail.com(Wu Ai<\/p>\n<p>Yun)<\/p>\n<p>Tel: +886 37 582514<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\"><p>Playing an important role of the litigation of traffic crash, the expert witness makes the reconstruction and the determination of the responsibilities. The persons who <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/case-study-on-the-litigation-of-traffic-crash-without-expert-witness-inferring\/\" title=\"Case Study on The Litigation of Traffic Crash without Expert Witness Inferring\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-original-case-studies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":154,"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103\/revisions\/154"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sh-foundation.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}